The frame

You've seen the arc: the launch, the deal-close workflows, the second brains. Some of it you tried. Some of it you meant to try. All of that is data.

No tracks this time. Four to five random groups, same five questions, same one-pager. Random on purpose — the agenda should be shaped by people who don't already talk to each other.

The arc so far

How the groups run

Zoom will auto-assign groups of 4–5. First name alphabetically is the scribe — they keep this page open and fill the one-pager in the last 90 seconds. 12 minutes total. The questions are a rail, not a march.

Five questions, every group

  1. Q1

    Since the dojo launched in April, what have you actually changed about how you work? What did you try that stuck — and what died on the vine?

    Honest inventory. Adoption vs. aspiration — both answers are data.

  2. Q2

    Where are you stuck right now? What's the wall between you and the agentic workflow you actually want?

    Name the blocker: tooling, time, security/compliance, know-how, or something else.

  3. Q3

    Look at the arc so far — launch, deal-close workflows, second brains. What's missing? What should the dojo have covered by now that it hasn't?

    Gap-spotting against the arc. The absent session is the interesting one.

  4. Q4

    Design the next three sessions. What topics, in what order, would make you show up without thinking twice?

    The forward agenda. Concrete titles beat themes — pitch the session, not the category.

  5. Q5

    What would you personally demo, teach, or convene if asked? Everyone answers before the group closes.

    Self-sort. This is how the fall arc's presenters and conveners surface — captured in the one-pager, not left in the air.

What each group brings back

Same one-pager in every group. The scribe fills it in the last 90 seconds. Same shape across groups is what lets us stack the report-backs into an actual agenda instead of a vibe.

The session we'd most want to attend
A title + one sentence on what it covers and who leads it
Our shared blocker
The wall more than one of us hit — be specific
Who in this group could present something
Name + what they'd demo, teach, or convene
One format change we'd make
Cadence, hands-on vs. demos, breakout size, async between sessions…

Host script — turning report-backs into the agenda

Spoken after the last group reports back. The goal is to leave the room with a ranked list, named presenters, and a date — not a summary.

[After the last group's report-back, audience settled]

Every group just pitched at least one session and named at least one person who could lead something. That's the raw material. Now we rank it.

I'm putting the proposed sessions in front of you as a poll — vote for the two you'd show up to without thinking twice.

[Open poll — multiple choice, pick 2, options read from the one-pagers]

[Results display]

The top two are the next two sessions. The people your groups named as presenters — you'll hear from us within 48 hours with a slot and a co-presenter, not a blank page.

The shared blockers you surfaced don't wait for a monthly session. Anything that's a setup problem rather than a topic becomes a setupathon or a working-group thread — watch for it on the async surface this week.

Next all-hands is the last Wednesday in August — August 26. You just wrote its agenda. See you there.